DAMAK, June 8: The Bhutanese refugees living in different camps in eastern districts of the country have extended congratulations and best wishes to Nepali Congress president Sher Bahadur Deuba on his election to the post of Prime Minister.

The National Reconciliation Committee, Bhutan send a congratulatory message to Deuba today, expressing the belief that an environment for the repatriation of the Bhutanese refugees to their home land would be built during his tenure.

The congratulatory message states that they have been living in two refugee camps in Jhapa and Morang for long and there has been no initiation for their repatriation, hoping that Prime Minister Deuba would take positive initiation to that end.

Stating that the dignified repatriation of the Bhutanese refugees to their homeland was the only sustainable solution to the refugee problem, the committee noted that the option offered by the UNHCR for third country resettlement while putting aside the alternative of their repatriation to Bhutan has made the future of the refugees uncertain.

The message undersigned by the committee coordinator Krishna Bir Tamang also recalled that the refugees were provided with food, shelter and clothes in the past when the Nepali Congress was in the government, hoping that the Bhutanese refugee problem would be resolved judiciously and in the long-term during PM Deuba’s tenure.

Similarly, the committee also send a reminder memorandum to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), stating that the refugees taking shelter in the refugee camps in eastern Nepal were facing difficulties as works have not been carried out as per the proposal of repatriation to home from among the options adopted for resolving the Bhutanese refugee problem.

The committee has pressed the UNHCR to exert pressure on the Bhutan government to take back its citizens as the rights of the Bhutanese refugees to be repatriated to their home country remains intact. RSS

GENEVA: The Syrian civil war contributed to pushing the numbers of refugees and those displaced by conflict within their own nation to an 18-year high of 45.2 million worldwide by the end of 2012, the U.N. refugee agency said Wednesday.

Those are the highest numbers since 1994, when people fled genocide in Rwanda and bloodshed in former Yugoslavia.

By the end of last year, the world had 15.4 million refugees, 937,000 asylum seekers and 28.8 million people who had been forced to flee within the borders of their own countries, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees said in a report.

Of those, 17 percent were new to their situations in 2012: 1.1 million new refugees and 6.5 million new internally displaced people.

That translates into someone becoming a new refugee or internally displaced person somewhere in the world every 4.1 seconds during the last year, said Antonio Guterres, head of the Geneva-based agency, also known as UNHCR.

“Which means each time you blink, another person is forced to flee,” he told reporters in Geneva.

Children below the age of 18 accounted for 46 percent of refugees worldwide. Most of the refugees in the world have fled from five war-affected countries: Afghanistan, Somalia, Iraq, Syria and Sudan.

The overall numbers rose by 6 percent increase from the 42.5 million refugees and internally displaced people in the world at the end of 2011.

KATHMANDU: The suicide rate among the Bhutanese refugees resettled in the USA has increased at an astonishing rate in the recent months, according to a study.

The US-based CDC study states that the resettlement coincided with the financial recession, making the typical refugee problem of unemployment especially bad. But economic factors are just part of the story. Burmese, Somali and Iraqi refugees also entered the U.S. during the downturn. These groups may have been protected by what Shetty describes as different “cultural perspectives” on suicide. Of these groups, most are Muslim, except the mainly Hindu Bhutanese.

“Money, money, money,” Som Nath Subedi offers as an explanation. Subedi, a Bhutanese case manager in Portland, Oregon and one of the first community leaders to bring attention to the suicides, says the intense poverty of the Bhutanese population may be a factor. “Iraqis, when they get here, they start looking for a house or a car,” he says. “We start looking for a job, how to pay rent, how to get bills paid.”

The federal Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) began to notice a pattern. Ultimately, 16 suicides were confirmed among U.S. resident Bhutanese refugees as of February 2012. The International Organization for Migration (IOM) had noticed a similar trend among the Bhutanese in the camps in Nepal. IOM documented 67 suicides and 64 attempts between 2004 and 2010. The numbers were high, but without a statistical comparison, it was hard to know how bad the problem was.

ORR tasked the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the Refugee Health Technical Assistance Center of the Massachusetts Public Health Department with investigating. By interviewing close contacts of the deceased (typically family members), the study team performed “psychological autopsies” on 14 of the 16 U.S. suicide victims. They also did a broader survey of the general Bhutanese refugee population to determine the rates of suicidal thinking and mental health conditions.

The study team confirmed the government’s suspicions; the problem was endemic. The global suicide rate per 100,000 people–how suicide rates are calculated–is 16, and the rate for the general U.S. population is 12.4. The Bhutanese rate is much higher: 20.3 among U.S. resettled refugees and 20.7 among the refugee camp population. A handful of suicides were reported among other refugee groups during the same period as the CDC study, but nothing like the number among the Bhutanese.

The rate of depression among the Bhutanese surveyed was 21 percent, nearly three times that of the general U.S. population (6.7 percent). In addition to depression, risk factors for suicide included not being the family’s provider, feelings of limited social support, and having family conflict after resettlement. Most of the suicides were within a year of resettlement to the U.S. and, in all cases, the victims hanged themselves.

Hanging might be common because few other methods are accessible to a poor immigrant with little English literacy. Firearms are too difficult to obtain. Medications are too, and they require knowledge of the English language few of the victims likely had.

Sharmila Shetty, one of the study’s lead authors, says the study can’t pinpoint why the suicides are happening, per se, but it did shed light on the reasons for suicidal thinking.

Post-migration difficulties that the victims faced offer clues about their possible motivations. Most are unable to communicate with their host communities. Many were also plagued by worries about family back home and over the difficulty of maintaining cultural and religious traditions. Most of the victims were unemployed. While few had previous mental health diagnoses, mental health conditions were probably significantly under-diagnosed in the camps where medical care was basic at best.

But few refugee camps anywhere boast high levels of medical care. And most refugees face language and cultural barriers. Still, it seems the Bhutanese community is unique in how many choose this irreversible decision.

Though both Shetty and Subedi were careful to avoid saying suicide is accepted by Bhutanese culture or Hindu religion, Subedi explains it is tolerated more. “For Bhutanese, suicide by hanging is a solution,” he says, explaining that for Somali refugees, Islamic prohibitions are effective deterrents. Hinduism is more ambiguous on the subject.

The severity of the conflict the different groups experienced may also be a factor. While no one disputes the trauma of displacement and decades in limbo in refugee camps, the conflict the Bhutanese refugees escaped from was relatively non-violent compared to other global conflicts. In the late 1980s, ethnic Nepalis were forcibly removed from Bhutan and traveled to Eastern Nepal, where camps were eventually established. Many were in the camps nearly 20 years until resettlement to third countries–mainly the U.S.–began in 2008. Stories of imprisonment, torture and rape are not uncommon. But, for the most part, younger people–those more likely to be suicide victims, according to the study–did not experience much of this violence.

The intense violence refugees faced in countries like Iraq or Somalia may have led to a greater resiliency to trauma, explains Jennifer Pincus, who used to work with Bhutanese and other refugees through the Catholic Family Center in Rochester, New York. “They were sheltered, I think, in a way, and so as a culture they tend to be much more sensitive to anything that goes on,” she says of the Bhutanese.

Despite meager food allowances, the camps in Nepal had better facilities than refugee camps in most other countries, says Lok Regmi, who was a community medical assistant with the World Food Programm at Beldangi-2 refugee camp before moving to Syracuse. And stressors like violent crime were basically non-existent. In some ways, Syracuse has been harsh by comparison. “I was beaten more than four times in Syracuse and it didn’t happen ever in my country,” Regmi says.