‘Very little doubt’ chemical weapons used in Syria

Syrian army tanks are seen deployed in the Jobar neighbourhood of Damascus on August 24, 2013. The United States said on Sunday there was "very little doubt" Syrian forces had used chemical weapons on civilians and dismissed an offer by Damascus for a UN team to view the attack site. (AFP Photo/)

The United States said Sunday there was “very little doubt” Syrian forces had used chemical weapons on civilians and dismissed an offer by Damascus for a UN team to view the attack site.

The comments marked a significant escalation of a showdown over the horrific attack outside the Syrian capital that killed up to 1,300 people last week, and came as Washington appeared to be positioning for possible military action.

Officials said President Barack Obama, who held crisis talks Saturday with top aides, would make an “informed decision” about how to respond to an “indiscriminate” chemical weapons attack.

An official told AFP that, based on the reported number of victims and their symptoms and on US and foreign intelligence, “there is very little doubt at this point that a chemical weapon was used by the Syrian regime against civilians in this incident.”

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Washington had noted that Syria had offered to let UN inspectors view the site of the alleged attack on Monday, but suggested it was too little, too late.

“If the Syrian government had nothing to hide and wanted to prove to the world that it had not used chemical weapons in this incident, it would have ceased its attacks on the area and granted immediate access to the UN five days ago,” the official said.

“At this juncture, the belated decision by the regime to grant access to the UN team is too late to be credible, including because the evidence available has been significantly corrupted as a result of the regime’s persistent shelling and other intentional actions over the last five days.”

The United Nations meanwhile said that its team would start a probe on Monday into what happened in the area, which is under rebel control.

President Bashar al-Assad’s government said the visit would prove claims by the opposition that chemical weapons were used against defenseless civilians, including children, were “lies.”

The opposition says 1,300 people were killed. Doctors Without Borders says 355 people died in hospital alone from “neurotoxic” symptoms.

Several factors — including a US diplomatic offensive led by Secretary of State John Kerry, comments from the White House and signs the Pentagon is positioning ships closer to Syria — fueled an impression Obama may be preparing to jettison his antipathy to new Middle Eastern entanglements and order limited military action.

But a White House official shot down a report in Britain’s Telegraph newspaper claiming that London and Washington planned to join forces and launch military action against Syria “within days.”

“The president has not made a decision to undertake military action,” the official said.

French President Francois Hollande told Obama on Sunday in a phone call that “everything was consistent” with the conclusion that Damascus was behind last Wednesday’s suspected chemical attack.
The UN chemical weapons investigation team arrives in Damascus on August 18, 2013. The United States …

“The two presidents agreed to stay in close contact to arrive at a joint response to this unprecedented aggression,” the French government said in a statement.

Russia, however, reacted to US maneuvering by warning Washington against making a “tragic mistake.”

Polls show Americans are wary of getting into another war in the Middle East.

But Obama’s credibility is on the line after he said last year that the use of large-scale chemical weapons in Syria would cross a US “red line.”

Washington may also want to send a signal that weapons of mass destruction, like chemical arms, cannot be used in Syria, or elsewhere, with impunity.

Republican senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, who have criticized Obama’s failure to use military force to protect civilians in a war that has killed 100,000 people, upped pressure on the president on Sunday.

“The United States must rally our friends and allies to take limited military actions in Syria that can change the balance of power on the ground and create conditions for a negotiated end to the conflict and an end to Assad’s rule,” the senators said in a statement.

“Using stand-off weapons, without boots on the ground, and at minimal risk to our men and women in uniform, we can significantly degrade Assad’s air power and ballistic missile capabilities and help to establish and defend safe areas on the ground.”

Experts say the most likely US action would involve sea-launched cruise missiles targeting Syrian military installations and artillery batteries deemed complicit in the chemical weapons attack.

Weapons fired from US planes outside the country could also be used, to minimize the risk to US or allied pilots from Syrian air defenses.

Washington would likely seek to act with a broad coalition of European and Gulf allies as Russia is seen sure to veto any attempt in the UN Security Council to mandate action against its Middle Eastern ally.

Obama called British Prime Minister David Cameron on Saturday to discuss options, after a meeting of all his top diplomatic, military and intelligence chiefs at the White House.

Kerry has spent days on the phone with Washington’s foreign partners.

US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said on a tour of Asia the military would be ready to act if called on by Obama.

“President Obama has asked the Defense Department to prepare options for all contingencies. We have done that,” Hagel said.